There are no psychological facts in the sense of conclusions of the science of psychology that we are justified in believing to be true
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @literalbanana
How about more object level stuff like subliminal priming effects? Or existence of color blindness? Or things Oliver Sacks saw?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
priming is mostly fake, oliver sacks is <3 <3 but I’m suspicious of everything he wrote, color blindness likely real
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana @vgr
oh unless you just mean linguistic priming stuff, that seems solid
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana
I think you're mostly talking about social psych rather than individual
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @literalbanana
Plenty is known. It's just not well integrated into theories.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
yeah, all the narratively appealing and easily-communicable theories are on the spectrum of laughably to tragically wrong
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana
That's just the superego of your shadow's inferiority complex projecting onto the oedipus
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.