There are no psychological facts in the sense of conclusions of the science of psychology that we are justified in believing to be true
Show this thread
-
I know, replication crisis and all; but that doesn't mean it's all invalid now. I'll hold on to my Stanovich; he knows what he's doing
I tend to assume it’s invalid if it’s at all interesting/sexy/surprising
-
-
OH or if it confirms a political narrative
-
1st one seems like a good heuristic (surprisingness generally; NOT unpleasantness/inconvenience tho); 2nd is just inverted confirmation bias
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.