why invade vs destroy?
-
-
Replying to @fire__exit
To some extent they're the same thing but destruction is even more expensive because you have to send enough energy to kill everyone there
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drethelin @fire__exit
with invasion you can send von-neumann machines that can slowly build up to take over that solar system
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @io_claric @fire__exit
Hence why I said at similar tech levels. If you can make planet killers they can detect and deflect them for cheaper.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drethelin @io_claric
if they're going fast enough you won't spot them very far in advance
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @io_claric @drethelin
that is a lot of energy... i wonder what sort of detection capabilities that level of tech would imply
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
bc i can think of some very small stealthy 50kg objects
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
me
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana @fire__exit and
i feel like suspicious is the opposite of stealthy... unless that's just what you WANT us to think
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.