anti-interesting questions: "who's to say?" "where do we draw the line?" they feel like thinking but they prevent thinking
-
= “Who am I to say?” = common cultural relativist cop out from ethical reasoning: logically flawed refusal to engage.
something I'm reaching for - "using language to deny the efficacy of language"
-
-
Yes, contradictory argument against meaning ends up with vacuity.. some of Nagal’s early stuff on altruism possibly relevant?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.