Less flippantly: discard the kind of thinking that leads you to frame questions like this one.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev @KevinSimler
You can't fix media bubbles or polarization in the abstract & the general sense. You are not capable of knowing what they are.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @KevinSimler
Abandon the universal, aggressively. How would *you* (not 'one') fix *your* bubble? How would you depolarize someone you know?
2 replies 3 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @KevinSimler
To reframe your question in terms that might make my viewpoint clearer:
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @KevinSimler
"but suppose (merely as a thought exercise!) that magic were real. how wd one cast an immortality spell?"
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @KevinSimler
I feel like you're assuming the answer exists and then expecting me to supply the details. I refuse. Epistemic moebius strip.
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @KevinSimler
Western philosophy has its roots in a) advice for emperors, b) monotheism. It is riddled with unjustified universals. Turn back
1 reply 5 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @KevinSimler
I'm not holding back because I believe it's wrong to try to solve a problem of this kind.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @KevinSimler
I believe it is *impossible* to solve or even *correctly pose* a problem of this kind, and *it is wrong to sustain delusions*.
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @KevinSimler
Sarah, you think understanding systems in terms of what metrics encourage is one of these false framings?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
sorry to be confusing, this is sarah, we think it's funny to pretend to all be the same person because we are dicks
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.