agree - alexander's stuff comes from the reality of preference, sunstein's from knowing better than people
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana @gabrielduquette
Alexander's most strongly paternalistic position is that no buildings should be >3 stories, which is dumb
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian @gabrielduquette
well other than magic of the city, and tall buildings are generally a cancer
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana @gabrielduquette
it's at least dumb now b/c it's reactionary: may have been a good idea at some point but we've moved past it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian @gabrielduquette
I have a hard time believing there's been enough understanding of it to move past it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana @gabrielduquette
moved past in sense that conditions have changed so it's infeasible, not in sense of incorporating insight
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian @gabrielduquette
agree I proved quality of life isn't feasible in my book :-P
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana
had this open in another tab, apparently satisficing quality of life b/w 10-90% depending on country https://ourworldindata.org/world-poverty/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @literalbanana
1st plot, upper left dot is 90% reporting dissatisfaction w/ standard of living, bottom right is 10%
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
money is definitely good, not getting leprosy rules
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.