If something is asserted be for your benefit, but you can't opt out of it, is it still for your benefit?
-
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana @lunavis
Probably it is not exclusively for your benefit, but this does not preclude its being a Good™ thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emusdrinking @literalbanana
✨ Lunavis ✨ Retweeted ✨ Lunavis ✨
that's what i figure https://twitter.com/lunavis/status/781440897133273088 … I wonder if it generalizes
✨ Lunavis ✨ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @lunavis @emusdrinking
any particular thing and its opposite are potentially good things - e.g. access to drugs, drug prohibition
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
interest in autonomy just sets the burden of proof high for prohibitions
5:33 AM - 29 Sep 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.