If something is asserted be for your benefit, but you can't opt out of it, is it still for your benefit?
-
that's what i figure https://twitter.com/lunavis/status/781440897133273088 … I wonder if it generalizes
any particular thing and its opposite are potentially good things - e.g. access to drugs, drug prohibition
-
-
interest in autonomy just sets the burden of proof high for prohibitions
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.