http://kieranhealy.org/files/misc/davis-thatsinteresting-1971.pdf … basically explains why @RealPeerReview is funny BUTpic.twitter.com/sdZ6pnnMac
...is it really true that academics find these papers surprising, interesting, challenging of their fields' "assumption-grounds"?
-
-
it seems like they're almost always directed against the gender studies academics' outgroup's assumption grounds, e.g. science professors
-
This seems absolutely correct (see 4 tweets) - I wonder what features of institutions would PROMOTE interestingness?https://twitter.com/meaningness/status/778775127915843584 …
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Presumably not; but interestingness is not a publication criterion. 1/
-
A paper has to be accountably publishable according to the meticulous ritual criteria of the tribe 2/
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.