in which coincidentally & interestingly he concludes that gay sex is not perverse a full 6 months before stonewall http://wrightjj1.people.cofc.edu/teaching/PHIL3000/Nagel,%20Sexual%20Perversion%20(1969).pdf …
the cooking show/library porn attitude toward food/books seems *perverse* according to the Thomas Nagel definitionpic.twitter.com/mdxfHN1vsE
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@literalbanana The binge/purge cycle (making no moral judgment here) seems like it would also count as "perverse" in this frame. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@literalbanana idk maybe Nagel is doing typical mind fallacy I mean he can't even imagine what it's like to be a bat - 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.