Is there a reason we don't take regular random samples to adduce virus prevalence in the U.S. population?
-
-
That's how it used to be used in 1920s judicial opinions :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's not sexy (or it wasn't) but the work never really stopped, and the CDC for the most part has remained largely ID focused I think but yeah public health schools in general do a lot of non-ID stuff seems like -nutrition and environmental stuff and social-sciencey stuff
-
You can really taste the nutrition.https://mobile.twitter.com/TheAgeofShoddy/status/1241270653090594816 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.