If you like way-too-deep myth investigations like this, you may enjoy this playlist of videos of a talented movie youtuber encountering a cinematic mythhttps://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdSEEAppvkB3KQLUL9j0LM998Nm-f5VUJ …
-
-
Show this thread
-
I particularly identify with him in video 7 when he’s having to dig up rare expensive academic texts to prove they didn’t watch the movie they’re criticizing
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's fun seeing the threads I saw you pursuing on twitter over a couple of weeks come together. I have no more thoughtful response other than to also note I "read" this post using the text-to-speech utility of Instapaper & will probably read it again at least once more.
-
oh I was just wondering about that! let me know if anything jumps out at you as funny/weird/interesting from reading with ears as opposed to eyes
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The only thing in this essay I do not emphatically agree with is "The canine transmissible venereal tumor was once a dog", which is a fantastic grace note but only true if you believe fake ideas like Searle's Chinese room. I would actually nominate it as a refutation of same.
-
yes! equivocating on nouns it shouldn’t even be possible to equivocate on
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why not ribbon farm? Avoiding exposure for this one?
-
context was carefully considered
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Very good.
-
Basically, what Wittgenstein said...
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.