Specifically, it seems to come down to: 1) secrecy, deception, and obfuscation of nefarious or self serving aims for as long as possible by running the equivalent of marketing campaigns with bodies of internal and external people who could affect your power
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
2) the demonization, smearing, and (often) elimination of any credible threat to or criticism of your actions or attempts to bring your motives of amassing power to light /8
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
3) waiting as long as possible to signal any imminent action and then moving swiftly and devastatingly to accomplish specific outcomes which increase your access to resources (financial, political, or whatever you’re competing over) /9
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Ideally #3 is done in secret and/or followed immediately by a disinformation campaign to confuse the facts in service of #1 /10
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
You can also accomplish #3 by carefully and quietly moving over a period of time but risk increases the longer your actions continue and can be observed; you lose control of the narrative when people can see what you’re doing and draw their own conclusions /12
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
These seem to be characteristics of strategies rather than specific strategies or tactics—the medium and messaging and channels that you use to accomplish these things vary tremendously depending on who you are and what your arena is but they are consistent /13
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
And you see this play out in everything from Mean Girls to PTA to International Affairs on a global stage /14
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I guess you could say that this just like strategy and tactics 1001 because it sometimes seems SO OBVIOUS to me now that I’m looking for it but I both don’t remember it being so obvious earlier in my life and no one really talks about it /15
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
My real question is WHY no one discusses this pattern very much in day to day to life because it seems like a pretty decent model for understanding who is trying to manipulate you or increase their own power and why they might want to do so /16
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Also once you see it it becomes easier to block or counter the actions and motivations of people trying to make it happen. What gives? Why don’t people talk about actions in these terms? I feel like I’m missing or misunderstanding something or maybe being too cynical /17
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
reminds me of the figurative use of “sociopath” in @vgr’s series https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-or-the-office-according-to-the-office/ … and also peter hintjen’s “the psychopath code” analysis of sociopathic interactions (“Mallory” = generic sociopath)pic.twitter.com/WIRUKFQdRu
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @literalbanana @vgr
I’ve read both and also Pfeffer’s work on power and I think that they were instrumental in shaping how I think about this topic, so that’s not surprising! They’re some of the few who DO talk about this
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
I remember passing
@vgr’s article back and forth with a friend like a decade ago and being like OMG WHY DOES NO ONE TEACH YOU THIS MODEL IT EXPLAINS SO MUCH0 replies 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.