Specifically, it seems to come down to: 1) secrecy, deception, and obfuscation of nefarious or self serving aims for as long as possible by running the equivalent of marketing campaigns with bodies of internal and external people who could affect your power
-
Show this thread
-
2) the demonization, smearing, and (often) elimination of any credible threat to or criticism of your actions or attempts to bring your motives of amassing power to light /8
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
3) waiting as long as possible to signal any imminent action and then moving swiftly and devastatingly to accomplish specific outcomes which increase your access to resources (financial, political, or whatever you’re competing over) /9
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Ideally #3 is done in secret and/or followed immediately by a disinformation campaign to confuse the facts in service of #1 /10
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
You can also accomplish #3 by carefully and quietly moving over a period of time but risk increases the longer your actions continue and can be observed; you lose control of the narrative when people can see what you’re doing and draw their own conclusions /12
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
These seem to be characteristics of strategies rather than specific strategies or tactics—the medium and messaging and channels that you use to accomplish these things vary tremendously depending on who you are and what your arena is but they are consistent /13
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
And you see this play out in everything from Mean Girls to PTA to International Affairs on a global stage /14
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
I guess you could say that this just like strategy and tactics 1001 because it sometimes seems SO OBVIOUS to me now that I’m looking for it but I both don’t remember it being so obvious earlier in my life and no one really talks about it /15
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
My real question is WHY no one discusses this pattern very much in day to day to life because it seems like a pretty decent model for understanding who is trying to manipulate you or increase their own power and why they might want to do so /16
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Also once you see it it becomes easier to block or counter the actions and motivations of people trying to make it happen. What gives? Why don’t people talk about actions in these terms? I feel like I’m missing or misunderstanding something or maybe being too cynical /17
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread
reminds me of the figurative use of “sociopath” in @vgr’s series https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-or-the-office-according-to-the-office/ … and also peter hintjen’s “the psychopath code” analysis of sociopathic interactions (“Mallory” = generic sociopath)pic.twitter.com/WIRUKFQdRu
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana @vgr
I’ve read both and also Pfeffer’s work on power and I think that they were instrumental in shaping how I think about this topic, so that’s not surprising! They’re some of the few who DO talk about this
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I remember passing
@vgr’s article back and forth with a friend like a decade ago and being like OMG WHY DOES NO ONE TEACH YOU THIS MODEL IT EXPLAINS SO MUCH0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.