Two important kinds of wrongness: -a claim escaping its low-rigor environment and being presented in a high-rigor environment (counseling talk —> science paper) -a claim escaping its high-rigor environment and being presented in a low-rigor environment (quantum woo)
-
-
I think it’s just as bad every time law has to deal with science and science has to deal with law - any transfer between environments is going to be a wrongness engine, regardless of “rigor”
-
The courts should ignore science and scientists should ignore all laws, it's the only way to be sure
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
tbh in general you gotta understand the context and constraints that something was made under before repurposing it for something else
-
the little sheet of information about medication side effects that patients get when filling the prescription is maybe fit for that purpose but extrapolating from that text how effectively people will perform complex tasks under the influence of that medication is literal folly
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.