Do you think it's reasonable to describe what a computer program for automated theorem proving, chess playing, etc. does as "thinking"?
I think of fermentation technology as “exostomach” - thinking technology is fine as “exobrain” and I’d include writing in that
-
-
The problem with the exobrain framing is that it doesn't work for thought processes that are shared between two conscious entities. Which of the two is the other's exobrain?
-
I agree that the natural unit of people is not the individual organism
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.