I find science papers much easier to read than longform journalism. Is there a secret structure to the latter, a way of reading it to find out if there’s anything substantive among all the clothing/weather details?
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana
idk how related this is to the specific question you're asking but a problem with the latter is how they very often omit full copies of cited/quoted documents despite being nominally public (like court filings etc) that are very time-consuming and/or expensive to obtain copies of
3 replies 1 retweet 10 likes
Replying to @alt_kia
I never thought about that - this seems to be a strength of informal youtube uh journalists (having a culture of linking original sources for claims)
0 replies
1 retweet
7 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.