I accidentally fell down a deep rabbit hole while trying to figure out how pH meters work. I thought this would be a really nice simple example of a scientific instrument, suitable for didactic explanation as part of an exposition of the failures of logical positivism. FAIL
-
Show this thread
-
I mean how hard could it be to measure pH? Turns out there are two (or more) types of meters that work on entirely different principles. That they are measuring the same thing depends on masses of theory and experimental confirmation that the user doesn’t know anything about.
2 replies 2 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
It appears to be literally true that no one knows how the better type works. They use a “glass electrode” that is semipermeable to hydrogen ions. The nature of the electrode is a closely-guarded trade secret and they appear to be discovered by trial and error, not theory.
3 replies 3 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
pH meters are peevish as hell and give maliciously wrong readings unless you are extremely polite to them. You have to recalibrate them before every measurement in case they are in a bad mood.
4 replies 0 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Meaningness
I was reading about this in preparation for indigo dying - opted for churched-up litmus paper & faith in error tolerance
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
update: churched-up litmus paper seems to read a full point to two points high but Lessons Were Learned
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.