You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Does anybody argue that monism precedes dualism in a stadial/developmental sense? I have a hard time not seeing dualism as the primordial reality.
a guy called Phil Stevens argues that the distinction between good & bad magic is a modern invention which sounds batshit to me
Charles Taylor argues the opposite (making “magic” one single thing, to be purged, was the weird modern innovation that secularized us)
definitely not Church prescribed /bad/ magic ie magic not done by their priests Older idea tho, the story of Julnar the Seaborn in Arabian Nights has magicians who are good or bad depending on whether they worship Allah Similar in Grimm'shttps://www.amazon.com/dp/0140137440/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_6yg8Cb3KKQXCJ …
proscribed whatever v funny to me that I feel the need to correct esoteric spelling errors while deliberately inserting common ones
i don't think it's ENTIRELY batshit in the weak sense of magic being more neutral historically without a clear "BLACK MAGIC" or "HOLY MAGIC" division. but i definitely bet people saw certain magic ACTS as having been good or bad, rather than the magic itself
hard to know what sources would get to the fact of the matter - anthropology? primary sources in history? most of the people involved in magic in the relevant times probably aren't literate
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
