What if national media lumpencommentariat were required to declare signature-campaign data for things they say with posture of “speaking for group X”? As in “David Brooks (1 million bobo signatures)” “Brooklynite writing in New Yorker (10k high-adversity-index signatures)”
-
How many signatures do you have backing up that take?
-
-
Yeah you’re not fit for populist lumpencommentariat membership
-
Oh I just got the loch ness monster ref
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.