you know those terraced Italian villages that are on really steep hills right on the shore? there aren't many of them, but I think that's about as good as it gets when it comes to city aesthetics, if you subtract the tourism. if you have a different idea do tell
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @willdoingthings
was just noticing how hideous my town's hillside houses are compared to like portofino
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana @willdoingthings
pretty sure the answer is that old things are beautiful because they used good pattern languages now extinct
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana
so far istm the look of the individual houses doesn't matter as much as their and positions and orientations... but I have such a soft spot for all hilly architecture even slums so it's hard to tell
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
slums look way better than these expensive dumpster fires imopic.twitter.com/ycyxipWrIW
6 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana @willdoingthings
In the ancient times (you know, like the 18 and 1900s), before air conditioning, people went outside a lot more and so went to some effort to make sure the outsides of their expensive houses were pleasant to be in and around. Now people just watch TV inside.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @drethelin @willdoingthings
it’s odd because these particular eyesores are surrounded by expensive/beautiful/popular parks
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana @willdoingthings
What if it's building codes? I was talking to my architect about putting up a little wall and park in front of my house and he said it wouldn't be allowed
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @drethelin @willdoingthings
oh definitely - in these gated communities specific bad aesthetics are mandatory I think
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana @willdoingthings
Also a lot of the things that make a house pleasant from the outside let animals and strangers inhabit it more easily
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
still, the beautiful houses built in the 1910-30s sell for a lot more than these (when they’re available)
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana @willdoingthings
Part of that might be location, I imagine a modern mcmansion would sell for a lot if it was in the 100 year old center of a town
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @drethelin @willdoingthings
it’s part of it, but I see ugly new buildings in nice old areas become “distressed properties” that can’t sell
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.