nothing is more threatening than the ingroup which might have been
Near outgroup is so lame. They’re worse than medium-far outgroup, far outgroup, and even ultra-far outgroup!
-
-
-
yeah the far outgroup is much less likely to reject you because they will never meet you
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't understand, those are all the same thing
-
say what you will about ultra-far outgroup, at least it’s an ethos
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ppl at the border are abject because their position can call into question the ingroup as a coherent identity
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s why depression sucks. Ingroup shrinks to one and you’re surrounded by people who suck.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
lameness distance function L = sqrt(sum([(Y_i - X_i)^2]) where Y is outgroupness and X is ingroupness
-
Doesn't lameness decrease as outgroup becomes fargroup? The units of groupiness are the same as those of lameness? No. This equation is flawed.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I believe this
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.