I find “painlessly wiping out the biosphere” implausible
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana @PereGrimmer
I posited that killing everyone would be negative-utility. But if we're being utilitarians, it would still be the right thing to do if if it's less painful than the *combined pain* of billions upon billions of lives stretching forwards for thousands upon thousands of years.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
(Not being utilitarians is fine, btw. But someone else could be).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SometimesSoftly @PereGrimmer
this seems odd given that most of the politics I see ANs advocating is like, pro-gene editing anti-drug war
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana @PereGrimmer
"We don't live like that's the logical consequences of our ideology" isn't really an answer to "that's the logical consequence of your ideology."
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SometimesSoftly @PereGrimmer
the ideology isn’t a straw man version of itself though
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
are you saying if I really believed that suffering is bad I’d commit mass genocide? seems counterproductive
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana @PereGrimmer
Anti-natalism isn't "suffering is bad." "If suffering is bad the logical thing is to commit genocide" doesn't make sense. "If human life is of negative value the logical thing is to commit genocide" *does* make sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I can imagine a situation where I really *would* think human life wasn't worth living--say, if every human would be literally tortured from the day they were born, and I knew with absolute certainty that would never change. And in that case, I would support genocide.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The difference between that world and this one is that human joy *does*, in the balance, outweigh human suffering, life *is* worth living, human life *is* precious, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
not sure what the asterisks are doing but ok
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana @PereGrimmer
... Am I misunderstanding the anti-natalist position? I thought that it was the life is of net-negative utility. Otherwise not sure what we've been arguing about.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SometimesSoftly @PereGrimmer
oh no it’s that suffering and joy/pleasure/etc. aren’t commensurable and don’t trade off
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.