I think the difference is not just that 2) are more basic than 1), but that 2) is a sign that it’s something core to an imaginary world
-
-
Show this thread
-
being asked to explain (2) is like having to tell someone the rules of the game, breaking the flow
Show this thread -
it makes people REALLY mad when it’s about their main imaginary game that they use to define their self-worth
Show this thread -
When people get mad and say “jeez it’s so basic read a first-year textbook” I suggest doing exactly that
Show this thread -
You can learn hilarious, amazing things that are not at all what the cranky person OR the textbook author hoped you would learn
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Slightly tangential but I think everything like this is a case of the brain compressing things over time to useful kernels. They feel very true but end up impossible to easily explain.
-
#2 I always find amazing I guess the anger comes from cog dissonance: they know they know it ... and then they can't actually explain it. e.g. gun banner: we need to ban all XYZ me: what is an XYZ? gb: it's QRS me: no, it's not QRS = ABC. What is XYZ? gb: IT'S OBVIOUS !!!
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.