Talk to me about these penalties. Enforced labour? Mandatory docked pay? Imprisonment? Stripping of passport? Chemical castration?
-
-
Replying to @LunacyNow
I jest. Financial penalties steeper than those which already exist. (But only if they outright flee their responsibilities. I think fathers who have gone through separation but still want to be in their kid's lives pay enough.)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BDSixsmith @LunacyNow
what about mothers who abandon their kids?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @BDSixsmith @LunacyNow
has me sort of thinking i wonder how many cases exist where children would be better off without such parents i think i support the moral groundings of this policy but i worry about at least two unintended consequences :/
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @LunacyNow
Parents keeping kids they shouldn't keep? It's a fair point. I suppose I see giving kids up for adoption differently to leaving the other parent in the lurch but I certainly wouldn't want to keep abusive assholes hanging around longer than necessary.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BDSixsmith @eigenrobot
how do you square the pro-life view with the fact that genetics is pretty much everything?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana @eigenrobot
The same reason I don't support letting disabled kids die
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @literalbanana @eigenrobot
Yes. To be honest I would find it very hard to rationalise it with any philosophical rigour. It's more of a visceral thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
that makes a lot of sense I’m glad I asked
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.