clinicians have no privileged knowledge when it comes to personality disorders
-
-
Replying to @fire__exit @nmgrm
it’s one of those things where the “diagnostic criteria” are so vague as to seem meaningless until you see the real thing
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
(so the diagnosis is clearly not “about” the diagnostic criteria)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
>falling for the diagnosis meme
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Ordinary Banana Retweeted sol
I’m agreeing with thishttps://twitter.com/fire__exit/status/1067823905614819328 …
Ordinary Banana added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Oh sure, you were just the first tweet to hand for pushing the anti-disease model agenda
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I was just wondering why people thought it was “doing normal science” for a while to do this procedure...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana @Octapode and
1. identify trait 2. make a survey instrument of it 3. administer it to people 4. say it’s a thing
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana @Octapode and
but now that I think about it, that’s what a non-etiological diagnosis is, so the mystery starts earlier
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think the answer is that it worked alright for infectious disease and gross trauma because the symptoms were fairly consistent to the underlying cause. And then that concept gets analogised far beyond its capacity, with its failures becoming really visible in mental health
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
almost anything called “public health” that’s not actually a transmissible parasite or vitamin deficiency
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.