sleep tightpic.twitter.com/YfLVeTFcfE
Show this thread
-
I was just wondering why people thought it was “doing normal science” for a while to do this procedure...
1. identify trait 2. make a survey instrument of it 3. administer it to people 4. say it’s a thing
-
-
but now that I think about it, that’s what a non-etiological diagnosis is, so the mystery starts earlier
-
I think the answer is that it worked alright for infectious disease and gross trauma because the symptoms were fairly consistent to the underlying cause. And then that concept gets analogised far beyond its capacity, with its failures becoming really visible in mental health
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.