Why must you C.Alex everything
Paradigm lock
-
-
Replying to @vgr @EvanCMalone
it’s not “everything” it’s literally his independent aesthetic conclusion
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana @EvanCMalone
Yeah yeah Fun fact: car companies have design people specifically focused on making sure doors close with a satisfying thunk I bet there’s product design literature on this. I suspect there’s a strong aural component. It’s a kind of anti-music, like anti-jokes.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
why anti-music? a satisfying sound is more music than noise
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
There’s no tension-resolution thing going on. It’s just straight up resolution. Like anti jokes aren’t incoherent or unfunny, they just don’t set up and resolve a premise. But I’m not attached to the idea. Just seems to fall short of musicality.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I’d summarize it as something like “reading mind in the revelation of precise fit”
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The design examples have precision of fit going on but the soap and other found-ritual examples seem to have significant messiness and imprecision In fact we might have here a perfect challenge for you: the oddly satisfying mess. Extra credit: involving mild destruction
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
You can feel the those characteristics deeply in the videos. I would change to controlled and/or purposeful.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @halfree1
that’s a good point - a lot of the most “oddly satisfying” things I’ve seen are skilled artisans/workers working
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
as if “skilled” gives off an aura that says “pay attention to me, novice human, and learn!”
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.