Oh wow.. you really went back to February conversations. If nothing else, everyone should be impressed with your dedication.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @RichHegedus3 @puellavulnerata
When you're trying to make a name for yourself, you always pick the biggest dude in the room to try to knock down. Most objective observers recognize what's going on.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @bodlandhodl @puellavulnerata
So easy to tell! They take turns bringing up the same old stuff. It makes them popular among each other and attracts attention from a top 10 crypto. Should I take note and start tweeting about the COO and collision resistance?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @RichHegedus3 @puellavulnerata
Yeah! and what about rolling their own language for Qubic? That's just bound to be filled with security holes! Everyone knows you're never supposed to roll your own. Oh and is IOTA really quantum resistant? I bet some of these gurus could break the encryption ON ONE HAND!
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
/s <-- I guess this was needed for some folks. Sigh. When you think you're smart enough to challenge
@c___f___b on cryptography, but aren't able to recognize mockery.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.