An underrated dynamic in the gender wars is that not all conversational tactics are open to everybody. In particular, tactics men constantly use on each other, and laugh off, are seen as crushingly emasculating and humiliating when used by women on men.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
ten bonus points for emasculating as something negative toward women which seems paradoxical to a naive observer
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana @vgr
oh I switched genders but I think it’s true in that case too
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana @vgr
e.g. women seem more “emasculated” by what people call mansplaining than men do for similar behavior
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana
As I was arguing with Sonya, I think that’s rational. If you’re the only female engineer in a team of 50, then any imputed ignorance is much more dangerous for you since the 49 men will draw dumb n=1 conclusions etc. In a majority-women context, the mansplainer would look silly.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
women facepalm six times as hard when a woman says something dumb than when a man does but I think it’s not just percentages
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @literalbanana
There’s a law of large numbers here. When you’re part of a small sample, you’re far more on guard with yourself and others in the small sample, since the marginal reputation all damage to all from the actions of one are high. Large sample = statistical security.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
I think salience has to be an effect to, not just representation - female gender is the “marked” gender in languages, more salient
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana
As in the non-normal variable binding requiring explanation? Security through null hypothesis obscurity
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.