it seems uncontroversial but I can’t find the source or any attempt at quantifying - anyone remember what I’m talking about?
-
Show this thread
-
they’re including drugs used by human communities throughout the world including psychedelics not just what we’d call “recreational”
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
I’m never gonna find it again huh
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
omg
@TristanSevers found it http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/06/05/is-pharma-research-worse-than-chance/ …pic.twitter.com/9BaDOeQTyz
4 replies 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
I think the actual explanation is something like this: 1. Druggies are trying to feel good specifically (positive affect, interestingness)
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
2. Pharma is trying to “treat constructs” but what consumers actually care about is feeling good and nothing else matters much
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Mental illness constructs aren’t actually what people (consumers/patients) care about, they care about feeling shitty or not
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Since DSM tends to have “clinically significant distress” thresholds for disorders you should be able to knock them all out by fixing that
4 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
my claim is somewhat different from his - that’s more related to mine than his
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.