@lisamurkowski Senator, please, this is dumb and needlessly obstructive. Vote yes or no, but vote on a nominee.
-
-
-
@lisamurkowski there is no precedent for punting on a year of the SCOTUS. The American people deserve to have their highest court working! -
@lisamurkowski I've voted for you 3x, plan to again, but *please* don't play this game. Urge your colleagues to bring any nominee to a vote!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Senator, if you want to obstruct the nomination process, do so. But don't lie and claim it's based on "precedent". It's not.
@lisamurkowski -
14 justices in US history were confirmed in election years. Most recently, in 1988. Your so-called "precedent" doesn't exist.
@lisamurkowski - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@lisamurkowski what precedent ? President Reagan nominated Anthony Kennedy in his last year in office. -
@AlexandraLevPSU
@lisamurkowski Reagan nominated, Johnson nominated, every prez has nominated, even in their final year. Just a straight lie
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@lisamurkowski U guys make up precedent. There IS no precedent for what ur doing. Ur just saying "the president is prez 75% of his term." - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@lisamurkowski A. Stop lying B. There is no such tradition C. Your lies suggest incompetence, lack of character, or D. Both E. I pick D.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@lisamurkowski Tradition? Precedent? Please cite a case of a president not making a nomination for an open seat for nearly one year.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@lisamurkowski Presidents declining to appoint in election years is as much a tradition as Senators sending me $10,000. So where my money? -
@Rschooley No word back. Come on lady, this is TRADITION.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@lisamurkowski As an elected official of the United States government, you should be absolutely ashamed of yourself & your ignoranceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@lisamurkowski Just making this up whole cloth. There is no such precedent. None whatsoever.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@lisamurkowski cite your fucking precedent. Are you a 3rd grader? -
@kevins_fingers@lisamurkowski Umm, I would believe that would be Ronald Reagan's nomination of Justice Kennedy.#GOPCantGovern
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@lisamurkowski the constitution is pretty clear on the roles each branch of government has. I will not be voting for you Lisa. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.