Alaska is taking steps to address a 17-year-old rule that has greatly restricted access to the Tongass National Forest, harming our mining, timber, renewable energy, recreation, and transportation industries. The Roadless Rule has never made sense in Alaska.
-
-
Please Vote No on Kavanaugh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you care at all about the environment, you will vote no on Kavanaugh. He sides with corporate polluters
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Please show that you value principle over party and precedent over president. Vote NO on Kavanaugh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Vote no on Kavanaugh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
America needs you to do the right thing even if you think it’s hard. Be a hero and a champion for all women across the nation. Put country over party and VOTE NO on Kavanaugh! Now is your time to stand up for what’s right!
#StopKavanaughThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
La, la, la, la, la. What are you doing to make sure Native Alaskans rights are preserved? Judge Kavanaugh has made it clear...Native people do not deserve protection. NO to Kavanaugh!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1) Advocates for Alaska Natives, who were crucial to Murkowski’s re-election in 2010, tell HuffPost they’ve been flooding her office all week and urging her to oppose Kavanaugh. They’re raising concerns about his record on climate change, which is already causing real damage in
-
2) Alaska. As a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh in 2017 held that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the authority to regulate hydrofluorocarbons, chemicals linked to global warming. They’re also unhappy with his record on voting rights.
-
3) Kavanaugh voted in 2012 to uphold a South Carolina voter ID law that disenfranchised more than 80,000 minority registered voters. The most pressing matter, however, is a case the Supreme Court is reviewing on Nov. 5 that could devastate Alaska Natives’
-
4) subsistence fishing rights. The case, Sturgeon v. Frost, raises questions about who has the authority to regulate water in national parks in the state ― the federal government or the state of Alaska. The case arose after Alaska resident John Sturgeon, who was on
-
5) an annual moose-hunting trip, was riding a hovercraft on a river running through a national park when Park Service officials threatened to give him a citation.
-
6) Sturgeon is arguing that his ability to use his hovercraft in this scenario is about states’ rights and that federal authority should be eliminated.https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/lisa-murkowski-brett-kavanaugh-native-alaska_us_5b92bed6e4b0511db3e20921 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I certainly hope as a woman you're not backing Kavanaugh. No one has the right to tell a woman what she can and can not do. He will put us back to the 1960's. Women's right should be moving ahead not back!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
As a woman and hopefully a decent human you must vote no on Kavanaugh. He will throw us back into the past and ruin woman's rights. Do the right thing for the people(all of the people) who voted for you and who will or won't vote for you in the future.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Senator, have integrity and please pass on Kavanaugh. You know how dishonest the Confirmation ordeal is - especially now. Women, particularly millenials, will remember you when voting. There is no dishonor in being prudent. The right justice will come along.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.