Should we really not be concerned though about the stat on how many apps sell patient data?
-
-
-
BTW, when you look at the paper, much of the access is cloud providers & Google analytics & the cohort was Android apps sold in Australia.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
You know how when you download a new calendar or email app on your smartphone & it just automagically fills up with all your data/appts. That’s literally how EHRs should be.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Not even sure I buy that logic. If there is FMH, presumably it would have come directly from that patient, to the clinician, who wrote it in the chart. Is Epic really arguing that there is data I supplied, that is relevant to my care, in my chart, that I’m not allowed to see?
-
What provider is taking the time to record the full name, address, etc of a patient’s sibling?
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Are they really saying that providers will dox our siblings?
-
, that was more of a risk in military paper records, where all the children basically shared the same MRN except for 1 digit. I did indeed receive PHI in my record that wasn't mine. That was... special.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Totally agree and I wish Judy understood that Epic trying to protect patients from all the apps that profit from our data often without our knowledge and 99.9999% of the time without compensating us is uhhhh well, uhhh, not a good look?pic.twitter.com/3vrsKCs9IF
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
“... in the form and format of their choosing.” I believe that language appears in federal regulation protecting patient privacy and guaranteeing access.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.