Honored and excited to be this year's March For Life keynote speaker!http://bit.ly/2CqYL7Q
-
-
Hmmm... I don't know as I would equate terminating a life with a surgical procedure that has documented health and, to some eyes, aesthetic advantages.
-
Aesthetic isn't a reason to cut off part of a baby's penis without his permission... and those health reasons have all been debunked, there are far more risks than any advantage. There is zero medically necessary reason to circumcise a baby, period. There is no pathology for it.
-
You make some valid points, but it doesn’t address his point about false equivalence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The woman gives consent for abortion though, no other consent necessary
-
Not in Ben's mind. The issue I'm pointing out here is the lack of consistency in Ben's pro life views, not a pro life/choice debate itself
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seriously? You’re equating the death of an un-born person with circumcision? I don’t agree with the latter either but get real, they’re just a little different
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nailed it!
Babies should not be mutilated without their consent. The problem is, the whole world is okay with it if the baby is male. Half of them would not support it if the baby is female. I have seen a Hollywood Tv Show insulting anti-MGM activists. Someone must speak up!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lib, this argument is highly unusual for you. Its very ignorant. I think you need to take a breathe and do some research on these topics and Ben’s stances. Your takes are near-gibberish.


-
I disagree with her position, Ron, and don't feel she's made her case, but her remarks are *not* "near-gibberish."
-
The logic she put forth is such a stretch that its like grasping at straws. She really wants to talk about abortion, but instead of expressing disdain on that topic, she failed to make a connection to a mutually exclusive topic. Gibberish isn't the best word. Poor is better.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah he’s not “pro-life”, you can easily tell by his desire for unnecessary wars and bombing innocent people. The pro-circumcision is, no pun intended, just the tip of the iceberg!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. LGBT 
