Benefit #0 of renaming "master" to "trunk": no need to debate if the default name is racist.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Benefit #1 of renaming "master" to "trunk": the branching metaphor is more consistent, and git has one less arbitrary word to remember.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Benefit #2 of renaming "master" to "trunk": you can toot people's accomplishments when their change is merged.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Benefit #3 of renaming "master" to "trunk": Single-branch development is a road trip, 'cause you just keep everything in the trunk.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Benefit #4 of renaming "master" to "trunk": It matches other uses of the name in version control. Even the Wikipedia article for the concept is called "Trunk"! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trunk_(software) …
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I agree trunk is better, but I think "master" in this case comes from "master copy", not "slave master". (I 100% believe "slave" is never appropriate as a computer term)
-
That may be true, but that doesn't make it a *good* choice.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
less than trivial
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
Denylist
- Whitelist