this git rebase mania is pure dogma. "clean history", "ugly merge bubbles" and "extra commits" are aesthetic, not technical justifications.
-
-
Replying to @glyphobet
@glyphobet how about “easier-to-understand commit history”? surely you see some value in communicating with your team better.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @glyphobet
@glyphobet I’m talking about commit history as documentation. Poorly-commented, stream-of-consciousness commits obscure intent.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @glyphobet
@glyphobet ah I see. Well, it’s easy, so why not? :) as long as you’re only rebasing unshared commits of course.
2:45 PM - 30 Apr 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
