This is true, but since Eliezer didn’t use mathematical notation, I’m nominating your tweet for the “most irrelevant tweet in human history” competition. You won’t be competing with Eliezer because he’s entered a different competition, but it’s nevertheless a prestigious award
I have no idea, since I don’t know you, and in any case, looking at your other uses of the hashtag, which is new to me, I think you’re misreading me there. Anyway... What is it that you don’t like about Eliezer’s phrasing?
-
-
And if you prefer, you can substitute “sad” or “self-defeating” for “ironic” in my previous tweet
-
of course you mean self-defeating, lawrus, that's why i said it may not mean what you make it mean you might like https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atrocious …pic.twitter.com/2yS7sV5JVM
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
that there are kinds of thought, that we produce maps, and that these maps "reflect" reality; while representationalism has rationalist flavors, we should bear in mind that rationalism is opposed to empiricism as for your other point about mathshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=ECQyFzzBHlo&feature=emb_title …
-
"we should bear in mind that rationalism is opposed to empiricism" And why should we bear this in mind?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
