The implicit substantive argument is "Neoliberal think tanks are frequently a front for rent seeking behavior, and the fact that you're unwilling to disclose your funding is a reason to believe this is the case". Hope that helps
That’s not a non sequitur. He’s saying it were so simple to defeat flawed reasoning, as you claim, there would be no bad policies.
-
-
You seem to be discounting the value of sheer repetition in promoting a point of view regardless of its truth. What percentage of people hearing a given economic POV would you say are as well-equipped to criticize it as you are?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
