Under this definition, political groups could be added into the equation of what is considered Hate Speech whereas in the UK it is defined as Expressions of hatred toward someone on account of that person's colour, race, disability, nationality, Under this definition it does...
-
-
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @GearyDigit and
You left out half that definition that doesn't suit your narrative. This is the full definition. "abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice against a particular group, especially on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @GearyDigit and
That can still include political groups since it says that it mainly especially and not only so on that basis Twitter would be committing hate speech by banning Conservatives on the basis of their politics.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @GearyDigit and
Can you reasonably demonstrate that banning someone from Twitter constitutes a form of abuse or a threat?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @GearyDigit and
It can certainly have an indirect effect on causing abuse since it means a person can be condemned and lied about on Twitter and they will not be able to rebut it which could have serious Psychological effects
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @GearyDigit and
Wow. It's almost like cruel and derisive comments about people can have a prolonged, detrimental effect, on their psychology. Makes you think about the importance of political correctness and fighting hate speech, doesn't it?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @GearyDigit and
People should be allowed to say anything they want, The only bar should be on threats, Most people will the have the decency to not insult everyone but it is quite simply an Orwellian tactic to try and ban insults, What i am saying is that banning someone from rebuting...
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @GearyDigit and
Yeah, and certain speech, can prevent people from effectively rebutting. It can create hostile environments that push the person away and keep them from expressing their opinions. You already accept this idea because you think it is happening to conservatives.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SortofSalient @GearyDigit and
I believe if no one was banned from Twitter on the basis of their politics then we would be in a good situation, I don't have a problem with the Anti Conservative speech, People can oppose Conservatives all they want the problem is banning Conservatives
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ElectricLizardz @GearyDigit and
No one is being banned for being conservative. Conservatives are being banned for hate speech. Their hate speech, endeavors to drive minority people away, making it difficult for them to rebut, a thing which you already agreed is bad.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
They are being banned and shadow banned for normal speech that is suddenly offensive to a tiny bit of people. The speech has evolved to now include every day ideas like Christian, Muslim, or Jewish beliefs against gay marriages
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
