LessWrong

@lesswrong

LessWrong 2.0 builds community, epistemic culture, and technology to help drive intellectual progress on important problems.

Berkeley, CA
Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2019.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @lesswrong

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @lesswrong

  1. 5. pro 2019.

    LW Team Monthly Updates - December A few minor features updates this month, but the big news is our work on the LessWrong 2018 Review. Read all about it here:

    Poništi
  2. 20. stu 2019.

    INSTANT STONE (just add water!) by jasoncrawford >"If only we could—bear with me now as I indulge in the wildest fantasy—pour liquid stone into molds, to create rocks in any shape we want! >"It’s called cement."

    Poništi
  3. 18. stu 2019.

    THE SKEPTIC'S TRILEMMA by Scott Alexander >"Skepticism is like sex and pizza: when it's good, it's very very good, and when it's bad, it's still pretty good." Read and discuss on LessWrong (1,284 words):

    Poništi
  4. 15. stu 2019.

    IMPROVEMENT WITHOUT SUPERSTITION by Zachari Jacobi >"When you make continuous, incremental improvements to something, one of two things can happen. You can improve it a lot, or you can fall into superstition."

    Poništi
  5. 13. stu 2019.

    AGAINST "SYSTEM 1" AND "SYSTEM 2" by Kaj_Sotala S1 and S2 are core in rationalist concept space. In this curated post, Kaj describes how researchers have moved beyond these concepts and how some popular interpretations are mistaken.

    Poništi
  6. 11. stu 2019.

    BOOK REVIEW: DESIGN PRINCIPLES OF BIOLOGICAL CIRCUITS >"Alon’s book is the ideal counterargument to the idea that organisms are inherently human-opaque: it directly demonstrates the human-understandable structures which comprise real biological systems.."

    Poništi
  7. 8. stu 2019.

    BUILDING INTUITIONS ON NON-EMPIRICAL ARGUMENTS IN SCIENCE by Scott Alexander New post with Scott with some good discussion on the comments on what kinds of theories we can reasonably and scientifically have beliefs about.

    Poništi
  8. 8. stu 2019.

    LW TEAM UPDATES - NOVEMBER 2019 (Subscriptions & More) This month we launched 1) a complete subscriptions overhaul, 2) bookmarks, 3) pingbacks (experimental opt-in only) Soon we'll release our new editor, LessWrong Docs into beta.

    Poništi
  9. 6. stu 2019.

    THE PARABLE OF PREDICT-O-MATIC by abramdemski Great post that covers a large number of core issues in embedded agency in a really accessible way.

    Poništi
  10. 4. stu 2019.

    LITERATURE REVIEW: DISTRIBUTED TEAMS by Elizabeth An example of the scholarship that LessWrong likes to see (cf. the neglected virtue of scholarship). Read and discuss on LessWrong (1,801 words):

    Poništi
  11. 1. stu 2019.

    BIOINFOHAZARDS by Megan Crawford, Finan Adamson, Jeffrey Ladish LW aspires to be a place for careful thinking about difficult and important topics. This post categorizing risks from both sharing and not sharing info about biological threats is an exemplar

    Poništi
  12. 31. lis 2019.

    New features! We have overhauled and completed expanded our Subscriptions; we've added Bookmarks; and included Pingbacks on post pages.

    Poništi
  13. 30. lis 2019.

    THE TAILS COMING APART AS A METAPHOR FOR LIFE by Scott Alexander A valuable post for both understanding the structure of reality and usage of language. Read and discuss on LessWrong (2,150 words):

    Poništi
  14. 28. lis 2019.

    NOTICING FRAME DIFFERENCES by Raemon The meta-frame (frame of looking at frames) is key to figuring out a lot of important outstanding questions. Some ideas are hard to parse or generate in some frames and easy to parse or generate in others.

    Poništi
  15. 25. lis 2019.

    WHY SUBAGENTS It's common for people to think of themselves consisting of "parts" or "subagents" which want different things. John S. Wentworth presents a model that provides a theoretical basis for why this might actually be a good way to model humans.

    Poništi
  16. 23. lis 2019.

    BOOK SUMMARY: UNLOCKING THE EMOTIONAL BRAIN by Kaj_Sotala >"If the thesis in Unlocking the Emotional Brain (UtEB) is even half-right, it may be one of the most important books that I have read. " Read and discuss on LessWrong (6,327 words):

    Poništi
  17. 21. lis 2019.

    INFERENCE & EMPIRICISM by SatvikBeri Inference (reason) and Empiricism: each a method for determining the truth and each with their own advantages and disadvantages, each preferred by some more than others. Which do you favor?

    Poništi
  18. 11. lis 2019.

    HEADS I WIN, TAILS?—NEVER HEARD OF HER; OR, SELECTING REPORTING AND THE TRAGEDY OF THE GREEN RATIONALISTS by Zack_M_Davis This highly-lauded post uses a simple probability example to demonstrate the perils of selective reporting.

    Poništi
  19. 9. lis 2019.

    VALUE OF INFORMATION: FOUR EXAMPLES by Vaniver What's the value of good info? Depends how much it'll change your decision and the value of getting your decision right. (Warning: moderately technical)

    Poništi
  20. 7. lis 2019.

    DOUBLE CRUX - A STRATEGY FOR RESOLVING DISAGREEMENT Double crux is the famed CFAR technique for resolving difficult disagreements between two parties genuinely interested in truth. The goal is to find those beliefs about which both parties views hinge.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·