Conversation

Mentions full of people trying to move those goalposts. "Use total pop!" "Use all crimes!" Listen. I am showing that when you control for violent crime rate, the disparity vanishes. That means that whatever disparity exists in total pop or total arrests is not due to race.
132
5,190
If there is no bias when comparing violent crime arrests vs killed, how can you possibly claim racial bias anywhere else without examining 3rd and 4th variables? Killings vs arrest of violent crime suspects is where we should see the MOST bias if police are killing black people.
73
4,064
One more point. Some are saying, "but what about non-violent crime." The deaths include ALL shooting deaths. Presumably, police consider anyone they shoot (rightly or wrongly) to be a violent crime suspect. I realize that doesn't include George Floyd but that doesn't matter.
103
1,836
The point is that when you stack all shooting deaths up against violent crime arrests, there is no significant disparity between races. And white people are actually slightly more likely to be killed. I still haven't heard a good explanation for this.
271
3,053
Well, this thread got a ton of attention. I'm glad that people are challenging the narrative. Figured I'd add unarmed stats here as well. 2019 WaPo Fatal Force Database: - 6.3% of black suspects killed were unarmed (15/236) - 6.6% of white suspects killed were unarmed (25/376)
Image
Image
Image
43
584
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Show replies