I have zero issue with that penalty. The Souths player was a statue. If it wasn't intentional, McInnes would've avoided passing the ball into him.
I don't agree with the rule. But the decision in my opinion, given that rule, was fair enough.
#NRLFinals #RefsFault #Crisis
Hardly 50/50- It’s more like a 90/10 harsh AF pen there against the team in possession. How can the ref make a definitive call as to the intent of McInnes in that situation? It’s too late for saints, but I guarantee it will see a rule change for that exact situation in future
-
-
RL doesn't deal in 90/10's. Only dead certs and 50/50's. I hate that refs are being made to determine a players intent. Only one person knows if there's intent, and they will generally deny it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.