Obviously an unfair attempt at vilification of the current SF DA. This is really a cheap shot regardless of what anyone thinks of the DA’s job performance.
-
-
It’s an implication of wrongdoing because the DA happened to hold a different position before becoming DA.
-
It’s an indictment of his [in]actions and him bringing his “movement’s” mentality from the office of public defender to that of the office of the district attorney.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.