Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @leedrutman

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @leedrutman

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    11. sij

    ICMYI: I have a new book. It is now for sale.

    Poništi
  2. Off-the-cuff idea: House still has power to impeach, but impeachment should be decided by a random draw of 21 circuit court judges. Remove the electoral calculus from it. And let the partisan balance be unpredictable.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. Props to the first Democratic senator and/or candidate who comes up with constitutional amendment to fix the impeachment process.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The Party Decides authors contributed to ’s roundup of the new primary rules. (Their headline, not ours, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ) See here:

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "America is trapped in a binary politics not because Americans want just two parties, but because America, like the UK, has a First Past the Post voting system that tends to produce just two major parties by rendering third parties as spoilers."

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 16 sati
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 16 sati

    On the day of the Iowa caucus, here is a graphical tweetstorm of the Democratic party's invisible primary. In short, the party didn't really decide. To the extent that it did, Biden was more or less the winner. Now, to the graphs!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Just ordered: Breaking the Two Party Doom Loop (), Politics is for Power (), Why We’re Polarized (), and A Time to Build (Yuval Levin). Very much looking forwards to all of these.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    These posts have been by far the most procedurally informative posts about the trial.

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Excellent new paper from & -- check it out. In brief, whites who display more prejudice are less supportive of democracy, net of relevant covariates.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    involve a quirky process in which voters' 2nd choices often matter. It's not ranked-choice voting exactly, but it shares similarities. argues that if we all adopted ranked-choice voting, our politics would be less polarized.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    It IS very interesting… So here we go 1/n

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Thanks to my friends on Twitter for your forbearance & help as I try to call attention to my new book. It’s always challenging to make sure people even know you have a book out, especially now. I so appreciate your generosity with retweets & kind comments.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Well, I wasn’t planning on writing 3,500 words about the state of our democracy today... but here we are!

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Jumping in to suggest it isn't either or. Opening the door to changing the rules of the political game *without* a strengthened civil society engaging the process is just going to result in big money rushing in to game the process by pushing changes that enhance their influence

    Poništi
  16. 2. velj

    19/ For more, please check out my new book, Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America: / END

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 2. velj

    18/ This is one of the many reasons I believe multi-party democracy is our best way out of the current hyper-partisan crisis. It’s not perfect. But given the perilous path we’re currently on, no change is a formula for driving off a cliff.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 2. velj

    17/As long as identities are cross-cutting, not cumulative, their fractal quality is less important. Coalitions will form, but power will be more fluid and shared, not binary and all-or-nothing.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 2. velj

    16/ And more parties allow more possible ways to resolve tricky questions of national identity with pushing all questions into overly simplified black-or-white good-vs-evil us-vs-them conflicts.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 2. velj

    15/ And it’s much harder for minorities to rule, since governing coalitions depend on genuine majority rule. Coalitions can shift to marginalize extremist parties. It’s easier to govern from the center.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 2. velj

    14/ By contrast, in a multiparty system, parties can be stronger because they don’t have to appeal to as many groups. They can police their boundaries easier if they’re not trying to win a majority.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·