Great paper. Worth a read and a bunch of navel-gazing afterward. Tal has tried to explain this to me over the years in ~5 minute increments, so I'm glad he finally wrote it all down. More thoughts below...1/xhttps://twitter.com/talyarkoni/status/1197682895198072835 …
-
-
Furthermore, the chance that any of us will discover a psychological phenomenon that is highly generalizable in this way is very low. I think we need to let go of this as an expectation for scientific contribution in the social sciences 6/x
Show this thread -
If we were completely honest about the limitations of generalizability of our studies, it would quickly become apparent that we are all “applied” researchers in the sense of providing very constrained answers to very constrained questions. 7/x
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would kind of hope that data / info aggregation, and taking variance seriously (ie modelling), could make it within reasonable reach. But I may live in a statistical bubble...
-
Modelling *and* induced variation, I meant to say...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.