I think that's a pessimistic view. Over the past two decades, we've gotten dramatically better with most aspects of infosec. Sure, high-profile breaches happen - but despite alarmism, their lasting impact on most people is not merely "externalized"; it's pretty nil. (1/5)https://twitter.com/NielsProvos/status/1099136820539940864 …
-
-
I usually enthusiastically agree with you. My lack of enthusiasm on this take stems from seeing an illusion of "secure enough" over the past 20 years, & no classes of issues eradicated. Still such a gulf between those invested in security & those below The Security Poverty Line

- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
agreed. Not sure what you mean about ppl that have unique security needs... you mean, for example, how to provide a dissident with a better security posture by just saying "use X, use Y." ?
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Is it just me or is it only for privacy concerns that the organization itself poses an insider risk?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.