Steven Vaughan

@lawvaughan

Professor of Law + Professional Ethics | Solicitor | Environmental Law + Lawyers' Ethics | Co-Director | Co-Director | 🏳️‍🌈

London, UK
Vrijeme pridruživanja: prosinac 2010.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @lawvaughan

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @lawvaughan

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    22. sij 2018.

    9 when Mum died. Dad semi retired to bring me up. State school, Liverpool. Law - Dad saved £5 a week in a coffee jar (now next to my bed) to help support me. Brilliant hardship funds Then the City. Then academia.

    Poništi
  2. prije 2 sata

    And I’m now up to do the “vote of thanks”. What a brilliant lecture. So many congratulations to

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. prije 2 sata

    He is not “laying the groundwork for an attack on the court”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. prije 2 sata

    Closing remarks - says his arguments are a “dangerous claim” to make. Because his work is only looking at cases where there are disagreement. He’s not saying any of the judges are left or right wing in any absolute sense. Or that they got the law “wrong”.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. prije 2 sata

    saying his work shows it is possible to put UKSC judges on a spectrum split along “left” and “right” lines. He’s being very careful (as Chris always is) to explain what he means by those terms.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. prije 2 sata

    Simply finding that some judges who always agree and someone always disagree doesn’t necessarily tell us anything about the politics of their judges. It might just tell us about their personalities, says

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. prije 2 sata

    Can we just look at outcomes of cases to say who the judge is matters? “Tricky” because hard to say that “all other things are equal” in similar cases. Eg. - did X have better representation than Y? So lots of people researching courts look at disagreements b/n judges instead

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. prije 2 sata

    We move on now to specialism and behaviour. Specialism impacts on who is in the court and who writes the judgment. But does it matter?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. prije 2 sata

    new book* looks at 533 judgments in 674 cases. Complicated by what he calls a “messy judicial hierarchy” (how cases get there) + need for certain UKSC justices to have certain backgrounds (eg Scots Law) * - this is [sadly] not a paid for Tweet

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. prije 3 sata

    Chris looked at 1500 Permission to Appeal decisions. Found (controlling for other factors) government applicants more likely to be successful at PTA than individuals. Also that multiple QCs boost chances of a successful PTA by 10%

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. prije 3 sata

    says that in the early years, the decisions of drew relatively little attention (using JFS and Radmacher as examples of notable exceptions). “That [lack of attention] has changed”.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. prije 3 sata

    And we’re off with inaugural lecture on politics and Initial thoughts turn to professional jealousy over these clean, neat, simple but powerful slides

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    Jeezo. I wonder how much of this sort of stuff has been overlooked because you can't buy the diaries on Amazon.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Last year we got a load of abuse when we added the rainbow flag to our profile picture. We don't think homophobic abuse is acceptable and we stand with all those LGBT+ people we serve and employ 🏳️‍🌈 Thanks for the comments... 👍

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. prije 8 sati

    Tonight’s the night! So, so looking forward to Inaugural later on

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 14 sati

    This episode we speak with & take a deep dive into his research into & in-house lawyers. We interrogate the data and examine the tournament of influence that in-house lawyers often find themselves:

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. velj

    My translation skills are available. I'm also fluent in Cork & have functional Longford. I understand Dublin & Kerry but I'd need time to get it up to speed properly.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. velj

    Today's short judgment on Northern Ireland devolution point is also noteworthy as a 3-Justice panel. In my research on panel numbers, I found that in its first nine years, there were in 3-Justice panels in only four out of 621 cases.

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. velj

    Many health problems find their root cause - and solution - in the law rather than medicine, but many people are often unable to seek adequate help. Hear from 's Prof Hazel Genn on setting up and the UCL iLAC to help address this 👂👇

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    Sometimes the architecture at astounds me

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I have been mistaken for a cleaner by MPs, and I have been mistaken for my fellow black colleagues by the media and in Parliament. It isn't about making a mistake, it's about making an effort. Here's my column.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·