Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @lawvaughan
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @lawvaughan
-
Prikvačeni tweet
#mypathtolaw 9 when Mum died. Dad semi retired to bring me up. State school, Liverpool. Law@OxfordLawFac - Dad saved £5 a week in a coffee jar (now next to my bed) to help support me. Brilliant hardship funds@cccjcr Then the City. Then academia.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
And I’m now up to do the “vote of thanks”. What a brilliant lecture. So many congratulations to
@chrishanrettyPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
He is not “laying the groundwork for an attack on the court”
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Closing remarks - says his arguments are a “dangerous claim” to make. Because his work is only looking at cases where there are disagreement. He’s not saying any of the judges are left or right wing in any absolute sense. Or that they got the law “wrong”.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
@chrishanretty saying his work shows it is possible to put UKSC judges on a spectrum split along “left” and “right” lines. He’s being very careful (as Chris always is) to explain what he means by those terms.pic.twitter.com/EZJ3PaJxEt
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Simply finding that some judges who always agree and someone always disagree doesn’t necessarily tell us anything about the politics of their judges. It might just tell us about their personalities, says
@chrishanrettyPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Can we just look at outcomes of cases to say who the judge is matters? “Tricky” because hard to say that “all other things are equal” in similar cases. Eg. - did X have better representation than Y? So lots of people researching courts look at disagreements b/n judges instead
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
We move on now to specialism and behaviour. Specialism impacts on who is in the court and who writes the judgment. But does it matter?pic.twitter.com/TJ3s2djn1E
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
@chrishanretty new book* looks at 533 judgments in 674@UKSupremeCourt cases. Complicated by what he calls a “messy judicial hierarchy” (how cases get there) + need for certain UKSC justices to have certain backgrounds (eg Scots Law) * - this is [sadly] not a paid for TweetPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Chris looked at 1500 Permission to Appeal decisions. Found (controlling for other factors) government applicants more likely to be successful at PTA than individuals. Also that multiple QCs boost chances of a successful PTA by 10%
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
@chrishanretty says that in the early years, the decisions of@UKSupremeCourt drew relatively little attention (using JFS and Radmacher as examples of notable exceptions). “That [lack of attention] has changed”.Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
And we’re off with
@chrishanretty inaugural lecture on politics and@UKSupremeCourt Initial thoughts turn to professional jealousy over these clean, neat, simple but powerful slidespic.twitter.com/8A92IWqZsm
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Steven Vaughan proslijedio/la je Tweet
Jeezo. I wonder how much of this sort of stuff has been overlooked because you can't buy the diaries on Amazon.https://twitter.com/chrishanretty/status/1225414323146719232 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Steven Vaughan proslijedio/la je Tweet
Last year we got a load of abuse when we added the rainbow flag to our profile picture. We don't think homophobic abuse is acceptable and we stand with all those LGBT+ people we serve and employ
Thanks for the comments...
#LGBTHM2020pic.twitter.com/kwzAvKWUjqPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Tonight’s the night! So, so looking forward to
@chrishanretty Inaugural later on#nopressurehttps://twitter.com/chrishanretty/status/1222965488944328706 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Steven Vaughan proslijedio/la je Tweet
This episode we speak with
@lawvaughan & take a deep dive into his research into#ethics & in-house lawyers. We interrogate the data and examine the tournament of influence that in-house lawyers often find themselves: https://lodcast.simplecast.com/episodes/ethics-in-house-legal-professionals …pic.twitter.com/5MtVgJLXCy
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Steven Vaughan proslijedio/la je Tweet
My translation skills are available. I'm also fluent in Cork & have functional Longford. I understand Dublin & Kerry but I'd need time to get it up to speed properly.https://twitter.com/tconnellyRTE/status/1225140863577272320 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Steven Vaughan proslijedio/la je Tweet
Today's short
@UKSupremeCourt judgment on Northern Ireland devolution point is also noteworthy as a 3-Justice panel. In my research on panel numbers, I found that in its first nine years, there were in 3-Justice panels in only four out of 621 cases. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2018-0030-judgment.pdf …pic.twitter.com/eyVWYjjVTc
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Steven Vaughan proslijedio/la je Tweet
Many health problems find their root cause - and solution - in the law rather than medicine, but many people are often unable to seek adequate help. Hear from
@UCLLaws's Prof Hazel Genn on setting up@UCLCAJ and the UCL iLAC to help address this
https://soundcloud.com/uclsound/voices-from-grand-challenges-justice-and-health-with-prof-dame-hazel-genn?in=uclsound/sets/ucl-grand-challenges …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Steven Vaughan proslijedio/la je Tweet
Sometimes the
#brutalist architecture at@UniversityLeeds astounds me#nofilterpic.twitter.com/a4py0Ixbzb
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Steven Vaughan proslijedio/la je Tweet
I have been mistaken for a cleaner by MPs, and I have been mistaken for my fellow black colleagues by the media and in Parliament. It isn't about making a mistake, it's about making an effort. Here's my
@MetroUK column.https://metro.co.uk/2020/02/04/this-week-i-was-mistaken-for-another-black-mp-again-12181869/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.