So far, much of the focus has been on immigration-related actions challenged in court, but that's an area where presidents generally have a lot of power anyway. Potentially more relevant to see how Trump appointees rule on other issues..
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's pretty silly to ascribe a plan or a motive to Trump in judicial selection. He's totally clueless and uninterested in judges. He's farmed selection out to conservatives who care about judges. Which is a good thing, honestly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A FedSoc-er choosing (stated) principle over partisanship? Yeah, pretty slim chance of that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.