Bork resigned "to avoid resigning himself to a lifetime of anticlimax." So should Garland, writes @DavidLathttps://twitter.com/atlblog/status/887323391891558400 …
-
-
At the time Bork was nominated, did he know there was a pretty strong chance he wouldn't even get a hearing, let alone a vote? Garland did
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Although remember what we all thought back then - that he would make it to
#SCOTUS eventually (bc Hillary was going to win).....1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There was never any guarantee Clinton would re-nominate him
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think most thought (1) lame duck session or (2) decent chance of renomination bc that was path of least resistance.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
That's what I thought but Garland still had some hoops to jump thru compared with normal nom
3:19 PM - 18 Jul 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.