DOJ spokesperson tells me they haven't put anything out on this. (Earlier, DHS said more was coming tomorrow. https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/trumps-finally-getting-to-implement-his-travel-ban-as-soon … )https://twitter.com/ap/status/880232517395255297 …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
AP says a cable was sent to embassies laying out the new policy. If this is true, it's headed right back to court: https://twitter.com/ap/status/880240979747516416 …pic.twitter.com/MNXlM71dbM
31 replies 379 retweets 331 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Can you explain why it’s going back to court because of that? I’m not sure I understand what’s going on here.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @Anthony
It's a definition of "bona fide relationship" that will be in court ASAP: https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/trumps-finally-getting-to-implement-his-travel-ban-as-soon?utm_term=.lkGogy0m35#.wmA9JEnVdo …pic.twitter.com/9sV0OMfHIr
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
Why didn’t SCOTUS spell out what the criteria is specifically?
4 replies 2 retweets 7 likes
The State Dept language very much mirrors what court said, albeit interpreted narrowly
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.